Retrocauschmality

Comments on a recent piece by Huw Price and Ken Wharton

I got a bit ahead of myself here, posting to substack before I finish writing the blog piece here at T4GU. It’s physics today. Huw Price has been harping on the “retrocausality is a thing” resolution (meaning non-magical physics) to the problem of Bell pair entanglement for decades it seems. It is a logically impeccable resolution, but the deeper physics is (I think) absent or bogus. I have a much better and 99% elegant, rather than merely half-elegant, explanation for entanglement.

I took a tea break, which paused the writing, and since I knew I’d be lazy and not care to post this notice to substack, I’ve down so now before I finish writing the piece. But it is only missing a review of Price & Wharton’s paper, and since you can read that one for yourself here, I think I am good to go.